Boosting Cooperation Between Agents in Diverse Groups: A Dynamical Model of Prosocial Behavior, Free-Riding and Coercive Solutions

Authors

  • Nazaria Solferino Economics Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata" Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy.
  • Serena Fiona Taurino Economics Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata" Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy.
  • M. Elisabetta Tessitore Economics Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata" Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33094/8.2017.2018.32.48.55

Keywords:

Cooperation, Dynamical analysis, Groups, Identity.

Abstract

Cooperation is usually stronger towards in-group members, because giving an up-right signal about themselves implies higher possibilities of reciprocity among members with the same social identity. We examine the case where collaboration between two groups is a mandatory condition to achieve success in a particular project, but in the first one, the social identity is quite strong. We show that the existence of a small share of prosocial players in the first group can create a sort of "imitation effect" so that each new member puts more effort in cooperating with the outsiders. On the other side, to avoid free-riding effort should be conditional to the other's commitment. This way to boost cooperation is usually more efficient than a coercive strategy in the presence of significant sized majorities or feelings of resentments. Our analysis suggests that it is appropriate, under some circumstances, to stimulate a multicultural paradigm devoted to value and manage diversity through an acculturation process emphasizing adaptation, interdependence, and mutual appreciation of different cultures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

03-12-2018

How to Cite

Solferino, N., Taurino, S. F., & Tessitore, M. E. (2018). Boosting Cooperation Between Agents in Diverse Groups: A Dynamical Model of Prosocial Behavior, Free-Riding and Coercive Solutions. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 3(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.33094/8.2017.2018.32.48.55

Issue

Section

Articles